Comparación entre las calculadoras de riesgo del European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) y Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG): predicción del riesgo de cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo en una cohorte de pacientes de Argentina / Comparison between the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators: Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer risk in a cohort of patients from Argentina

Objetivo Comparar el desempeño de las calculadoras de riesgo del European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC-RC) y el Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG-RC) en predecir el riesgo de presentar cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo. Material y métodos Retrospectivamente, se identificó a los pacientes que fueron sometidos a biopsia prostática en el Sanatorio Allende Cerro, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina, desde enero de 2018 a diciembre de 2021. Se calculó la probabilidad de tener cáncer de próstata con las dos calculadoras por separado y luego se compararon los resultados para establecer cuál de las dos tuvo mejor desempeño. Para esto, se analizaron áreas bajo la curva (ABC). Resultados Se incluyeron 250 pacientes, 140 (56%) presentaron cáncer de próstata, de los cuales 92 (36,8%) tuvieron cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo (Score de Gleason ≥7). Los pacientes que presentaron cáncer tenían mayor edad, mayor valor de antígeno prostático específico (PSA) y menor tamaño prostático. El ABC para predecir la probabilidad de tener cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo fue de 0,79 y 0,73 para PBCG-RC y ERSPC-RC, respectivamente (p=0,0084). Conclusión En esta cohorte de pacientes, ambas calculadoras de riesgo de cáncer de próstata mostraron un buen desempeño para predecir el riesgo de cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo, si bien el PBCG-RC mostró mejor exactitud. (AU)

Objective To compare the performance of the risk calculators of the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) in predicting the risk of presenting clinically significant prostate cancer. Material and methods Retrospectively, patients who underwent prostate biopsy at Sanatorio Allende Cerro, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina, were identified from January 2018 to December 2021. The probability of having prostate cancer was calculated with the two calculators separately and then the results were compared to establish which of the two performed better. For this, areas under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. Results 250 patients were included, 140 (56%) presented prostate cancer, of which 92 (65.71%) had clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥7). The patients who presented cancer were older, had a higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, and had a smaller prostate size. The AUC to predict the probability of having clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.79 and 0.73 for PBCG-RC and ERSPC-RC respectively (p=0.0084). Conclusion In this cohort of patients, both prostate cancer risk calculators performed well in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer risk, although the PBCG-RC showed better accuracy. (AU)

Manejo de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata localizado y recurrencia bioquímica en España: encuesta médica / Management of patients with localized prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence in Spain: A medical survey

Introducción El tratamiento de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata (CaP) está establecido en las guías de práctica clínica, las cuales se basan en estudios aleatorizados según el nivel de evidencia. En España se desconoce el grado de cumplimiento de estas guías en la práctica clínica. Objetivos Describir los perfiles de los pacientes con CaP en el momento del diagnóstico y el manejo de los pacientes con CaP localizado y con recurrencia bioquímica (RBQ) en España. Materiales y métodos Se realizó una encuesta médica en 3 especialidades médicas (85 urólogos [URO], 64 oncólogos radioterápicos [OR] y 21 oncólogos médicos [OM]). Para este estudio se elaboraron 3 cuestionarios, 2 con 22 preguntas (URO y OR) y uno con 21 preguntas (OM). Resultados La incidencia anual de CaP en los hospitales participantes (N=131) fue de 24.057 casos. La incidencia anual extrapolada a España fue de 40.531 casos. La prevalencia estimada de CaP en España es de 221.689. Cabe destacar que el 79 y el 80% de los pacientes atendidos por URO y OR, respectivamente, presentaban CaP localizado en el momento del diagnóstico. La biopsia fue la prueba diagnóstica más utilizada en las 3 especialidades, seguida de la tomografía computarizada abdominopélvica. Más del 90% de los pacientes con RBQ se sometieron a pruebas estándar. Las técnicas de imagen de nueva generación y la PET con colina/PSMA se siguen utilizando en menor medida. Actualmente, la mayoría de los pacientes con CaP localizado reciben tratamiento con cirugía o radioterapia, pero en el caso de los pacientes con RBQ, los URO y OR prefieren la radioterapia y los OM la terapia de privación androgénica exclusiva o combinada. Conclusión Este estudio describe los perfiles de los pacientes en el momento del diagnóstico y proporciona una visión general del manejo terapéutico actual del CaP localizado y con RBQ en la práctica clínica en España. (AU)

Introduction The management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is established in clinical practice guidelines, which are based on randomized studies according to the level of evidence. In Spain, the degree of compliance with these guidelines in clinical practice is unknown. Objectives To describe the profiles of PCa patients at the time of diagnosis and the management of patients with localized PCa and those with biochemical recurrence (BCR) in Spain. Materials and methods A medical survey was conducted in specialized care (85 urologists [UROs], 64 radiation oncologists [ROs], and 21 medical oncologists [MOs]). Three questionnaires were developed for this study with 22 (UROs and ROs) or 21 questions (MOs). Results The annual incidence of PCa was 24,057 in participating hospitals (N=131). The extrapolated annual incidence in Spain is 40,531 cases. The estimated prevalence of PCa in Spain is 221,689. Of note, 79 and 80% of patients seen by UROs and ROs, respectively had localized PCa at diagnosis. Biopsy was the most used diagnostic test among the 3 specialties, followed by abdominopelvic computer tomography. More than 90% of patients with BCR underwent standard tests. Next generation imaging tests and PET-choline/PSMA are still used residually. Most patients with localized PCa are currently treated with either surgery or radiotherapy, while for BCR patients, UROs and ROs prefer radiotherapy and MOs androgen deprivation therapy alone or in combination. Conclusion This study describes patient profiles at the time of diagnosis and provides an overview of the current therapeutic management of localized PCa and BCR in clinical practice in Spain. (AU)

Correlación entre los índices estandarizados SUVmáx de la PET/TC con [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T pre-prostatectomía radical y los resultados histopatológicos finales: un análisis en profundidad / Correlation between pre-radical prostatectomy Standardized SUVmax ratios detected on 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT and final histopathology outcomes: An in-depth analysis

Objetivo: Evaluar el potencial predictivo del valor máximo de captación estandarizada (SUVmáx) de los tumores intraprostáticos obtenidos en la PET/TC preoperatoria con [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T (SUVT), así como sus relaciones con el SUVmáx en el hígado (SUVTLR) y la glándula parótida (SUVTPR) con respecto a los hallazgos histopatológicos. Material y métodos: Se evaluaron los datos de pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical (PR) por cáncer de próstata (CaP) en nuestra clínica entre los años 2017-2020. Se excluyeron aquellos pacientes con una neoplasia maligna secundaria, antecedentes de resección transuretral de próstata, tratamiento previo para CaP o que fueron sometidos a una PR de rescate. Dos especialistas en medicina nuclear con más de una década de experiencia cada uno revisaron las imágenes del estudio de cuerpo completo obtenidas con el mismo equipo, según protocolo, para obtener el consenso en cada lesión. Se estudiaron las relaciones entre edad, antígeno específico de la próstata (PSA), volumen de la próstata, estadio clínico, el grado de la clasificación de la Sociedad Internacional de Anatomía Patología Urológica (ISUP, por sus siglas en inglés) en la biopsia, el grupo de riesgo de D’amico, el volumen tumoral intraprostático identificado en la revisión histopatológica final de la muestra (HPTV) y el grado HP-ISUP. Se analizó la invasión de vesículas seminales (SVI), la invasión extracapsular (ECI), el margen quirúrgico positivo (PSM), SUVT, SUVTLR y SUVTPR. Resultados: La edad media de los 64 pacientes incluidos fue de 64,1±5,3 años. Se observó una correlación estadísticamente significativa entre los valores de SUVT, SUVTLR, SUVTPR y los parámetros del estadio histopatológico, como el grado ISUP de la biopsia, la clasificación de riesgo D’amico, HP-ISUP, HPTV (p<0,05). PSMATV, SUVT y SUVTLR fueron predictores estadísticamente significativos de invasión extracapsular, mientras que PSA, PSMATV y SUVTLR fueron predictores significativos de SVI (p<0,05)... (AU)

Objective: To evaluate the predictive potential of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) value of intraprostatic tumors derived from preoperative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT (SUVT), and its ratios to SUVmax in the liver (SUVTLR) and parotid gland (SUVTPR) with respect to histopathological findings. Materials and methods: Data from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC) at our clinic between 2017-2020 were assessed. Patients with a secondary malignancy, a history of transurethral prostate resection, prior treatment for PC, or who received salvage RP were excluded. Whole-body images obtained using the same device, as per the guidelines, were reviewed by two nuclear medicine specialists with more than a decade of experience to reach a consensus for each lesion. The relationships between age, PSA, Prostate Volume, clinical T stage, biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology grade (ISUP), D’amico risk group, intraprostatic tumor volume (HPTV) identified in the final histopathological specimen review, HP-ISUP grade, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), extracapsular invasion (ECI), positive surgical margine (PSM), SUVT, SUVTLR, and SUVTPR were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the 64 included patients was 64.1±5.3 y-o. A statistically significant correlation was found between SUVT, SUVTLR, SUVTPR values, and histopathologic stage parameters, such as biopsy ISUP, D’amico Risk Classification, HP-ISUP, HPTV (P<.05). PSMATV, SUVT, and SUVTLR were statistically significant predictors of extracapsular invasion, while PSA, PSMATV, and SUVTLR were significant predictors of SVI (P<.05). Conclusion: The standardized SUVT, SUVTLR, and SUVTPR values could be employed as noninvasive markers to assist in predicting postoperative histopathological findings, particularly ECI, SVI, and PSM. (AU)

Pentafecta evaluation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by risk group.

OBJECTIVE: Radical prostatectomy is a therapeutic option in organ-confined prostate cancer. As the development of robotic systems progresses, the approach with this technology has begun to impact the functional and oncological outcomes of urological patients. The objective is to report the rate of pentafecta in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) stratified by risk groups. METHOD: Retrospective, observational, descriptive study from 2013 to 2020 that included 112 patients undergoing RARP. RESULTS: A rate of pentafecta at 12 months of follow-up of 35.7% (n = 40) was obtained. In the subanalysis by risk groups, at 1-year follow-up, was obtained an index of 43% (n = 26), 26% (n = 9) and 22% (n = 4) in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatectomy showed functional and oncological results similar to those reported in the literature with robotic approach, regardless of the risk group for prostate cancer.

OBJETIVO: La prostatectomía radical es la alternativa terapéutica de elección en el cáncer de próstata confinado al órgano. Conforme avanza el desarrollo de los sistemas robóticos, el abordaje con esta tecnología ha comenzado a impactar en los desenlaces funcionales y oncológicos de los pacientes urológicos. El objetivo es reportar el índice de pentafecta en pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot (PRRA) estratificados por grupos de riesgo. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, descriptivo, de 2013 a 2020, que incluyó 112 pacientes sometidos a PRAR. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo un índice de pentafecta a 12 meses de seguimiento del 35.7% (n = 40). En el subanálisis por grupos de riesgo, al año de seguimiento, se obtuvieron unos índices del 43% (n = 26), el 26% (n = 9) y el 22% (n = 4) en los pacientes de bajo, intermedio y alto riesgo, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: La prostatectomía demostró resultados funcionales y oncológicos similares a lo reportado en la literatura con abordaje robótico independientemente del grupo de riesgo del cáncer de próstata.

El papel del antígeno prostático específico (PSA) y el estadio patológico antes de la radioterapia en la predicción de los resultados de la resonancia magnética multiparamétrica (RMmp) en pacientes con recidiva del cancer de próstata tras prostatectomía radical / Role of PSA levels and pathological stadiation before radiation therapy in predicting mp-MRI results in patients with prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Objetivo Evaluar el valor del antígeno prostático específico (PSA) en la predicción de los resultados de la resonancia magnética multiparamétrica (RMmp) en pacientes con cáncer de próstata (CaP) de alto (puntuación de Gleason≥8, pT≥3, pN1) y bajo grado (puntuación de Gleason<8, pT<3, pN0). Materiales y métodos Ciento ochenta y ocho pacientes se sometieron a una RMmp de 1,5-T después de la prostatectomía radical y antes de la radioterapia. Los pacientes se dividieron en 2 grupos: el grupo A incluía pacientes con recidiva bioquímica (RB) y el grupo B pacientes sin RB pero con alto riesgo de recidiva local. Teniendo en cuenta la puntuación de Gleason, pT y pN como variables de agrupación independientes, se realizaron análisis ROC de los niveles de PSA en el momento del diagnóstico del CaP primario y antes de la radioterapia con el fin de identificar el punto de corte óptimo para predecir el resultado de la RMmp. Resultados En los grupos A y B, el área bajo la curva del PSA antes de la radioterapia fue superior a la del PSA en el momento del diagnóstico del CaP, en tumores de bajo y alto grado. Para los tumores de bajo grado, la mejor área bajo la curva fue de 0,646 y 0,685 en el grupo A y B, respectivamente; para los tumores de alto grado, la mejor área bajo la curva fue de 0,705 y 1 en el grupo A y B, respectivamente. Para los tumores de bajo grado, el punto de corte óptimo del PSA fue de 0,565-0,58ng/ml en el grupo A (sensibilidad y especificidad: 70,5% y 66%), y de 0,11-0,13ng/ml en el B (sensibilidad y especificidad: 62,5% y 84,6%). Para los tumores de alto grado, el punto de corte de PSA óptimo fue de 0,265-0,305ng/ml en el grupo A (sensibilidad y especificidad: 95% y 42,1%), y de 0,13-0,15ng/ml en el grupo B (sensibilidad y especificidad: 100%). Conclusión La RMmp se debe realizar como herramienta diagnóstica complementaria siempre que se detecte una RB, especialmente en el CaP de alto grado... (AU)

Objective To evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value in multiparametric magnetic resonance imagin (mp-MRI) results prediction, analyzing patients with high (Gleason Score ≥8, pT≥3, pN1) and low grade (Gleason Score <8, pT<3, pN0) prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods One hundred eighty-eight patients underwent 1.5-T mp-MRI after radical prostatectomy and before radiotherapy. They were divided into 2 groups: A and B, for patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and without BCR but with high local recurrence risk. Considering Gleason Score, pT and pN as independent grouping variables, ROC analyses of PSA levels at primary PCa diagnosis and PSA before radiotherapy were performed in order to identify the optimal cut-off to predict mp-MRI result. Results Group A and B showed higher area under the curve for PSA before radiotherapy than PSA at PCa diagnosis, in low and high grade tumors. For low grade tumors the best area under the curve was 0.646 and 0.685 in group A and B; for high grade the best area under the curve was 0.705 and 1 in group A and B, respectively. For low grade tumors the best PSA cut-off was 0.565-0.58ng/ml in group A (sensitivity, specificity: 70.5%, 66%), and 0.11-0.13ng/ml in B (sensitivity, specificity: 62.5%, 84.6%). For high grade tumors, the best PSA cut-off obtained was 0.265-0.305ng/ml in group A (sensitivity, specificity: 95%, 42.1%), and 0.13-0.15ng/ml in B (sensitivity, specificity: 100%). Conclusion Mp-MRI should be performed as added diagnostic tool always when a BCR is detected, especially in high grade PCa. In patients without BCR, mp-MRI results, although poorly related to pathological stadiation, still have a good diagnostic performance, mostly when PSA>0.1-0.15ng/ml. (AU)

Correlation between pre-radical prostatectomy standardized SUVmax ratios detected on 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT and final histopathology outcomes: an in-depth analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive potential of the maximum standardized uptake value(SUVmax) value of intraprostatic tumors derived from preoperative 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT (SUVT), and its ratios to SUVmax in the liver (SUVTLR) and parotid gland (SUVTPR) with respect to histopathological findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC) at our clinic between 2017 and 2020 were assessed. Patients with a secondary malignancy, a history of transurethral prostate resection, prior treatment for PC, or who received salvage RP were excluded. Whole-body images obtained using the same device, as per the guidelines, were reviewed by two nuclear medicine specialists with more than a decade of experience to reach a consensus for each lesion. The relationships between age, PSA, Prostate Volume, clinical T stage, biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology grade (ISUP), D'amico risk group, intraprostatic tumor volume (HPTV) identified in the final histopathological specimen review, HP-ISUP grade, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), extracapsular invasion (ECI), positive surgical margine (PSM), SUVT, SUVTLR, and SUVTPR were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 64 included patients was 64.1 ±â€¯5.3. A statistically significant correlation was found between SUVT, SUVTLR, SUVTPR values, and histopathologic stage parameters, such as biopsy ISUP, D'amico Risk Classification, HP-ISUP, HPTV (p < 0.05). PSMATV, SUVT, and SUVTLR were statistically significant predictors of extracapsular invasion, while PSA, PSMATV, and SUVTLR were significant predictors of SVI (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The standardized SUVT, SUVTLR, and SUVTPR values could be employed as noninvasive markers to assist in predicting postoperative histopathological findings, particularly ECI, SVI, and PSM.

A new promising indicator in prostate cancer screening: Prostate-specific antigen fluctuation rate.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether PSA fluctuation can be used to predict the risk of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 1244 patients who underwent prostate biopsy at Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital between 2013 and 2021 (848 in non-cancer; 396 in cancer). The patient's age, last two PSA values (PSA1 and PSA2) within three months before the biopsy, the duration between two PSAs (days), prostate size (g) and PSA density (PSAD) were all recorded. PSA fluctuation rate (PSAfr) was defined as the change rate between two PSA values. RESULTS: PSAfr was significantly higher in the non-cancer group than in the prostate cancer group (15.2% (20.5) and 9.6% (14.4), P=.019). A Simple linear regression was used to examine the relationship between PSAfr and other factors such as age, PSA, PSAD, and prostate volume, but it was shown that these had no effect on PSA fluctuations. ROC analysis revealed a relatively low Area Under the Curve (AUC) for PSAfr (AUC, 0.584 (0.515-0.653)). However, the cut-off value of 12.35% was found to be significant, with a sensitivity of 58% and a specificity of 59% (P:.019, 95%CI). The odds ratio, adjusted for age, PSAD, and PSA2, was calculated as 0.545 (0.33-0.89) using logistic regression analysis to show the relationship between prostate cancer and PSAfr. As a result, those with high PSAfr were found to be 1.83 times less likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than those with low fluctuations. CONCLUSION: PSAfr could be used in nomograms to predict prostate cancer risk and reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.

Effects of androgen deprivation therapy on elderly men with high-risk prostate cancer: PROSARC observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic carcinoma (PC) is a frequent neoplasm in elderly patients. Although androgen deprivation is associated with survival benefits, it is also related to adverse effects such as osteoporosis, frailty, or sarcopenia, which can negatively affect the patient's quality of life. This study aims to quantify and evaluate the prevalence of osteoporosis, frailty, or sarcopenia in elderly PC patients before and after androgen deprivation. We present data from an interim analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PROSARC is a national (Spain) prospective observational study (May-2022-May-2025) still in progress in 2 hospitals. It includes patients with high-risk PC, aged ≥70 years, non-candidates for local treatment and scheduled to start androgen deprivation therapy. The following variables are analyzed: comorbidity, frailty (Fried frailty phenotype criteria), osteoporosis, sarcopenia (EWGSOP2), fat mass and muscle mass, before treatment and after 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A 6-month follow-up was completed by 12/25 included patients (mean age, 84 years), with a high baseline prevalence of pre-frailty/frailty (67.7%), sarcopenia (66.7%) and osteoporosis (25%). Treatment did not significantly alter these variables or comorbidity. We observed changes in body mass index (p=0.666), decreased mean value of appendicular muscle mass (p=0.01) and increased percentage of fat mass (p=0.012). CONCLUSION: In patients with high-risk PC, advanced age and a considerable prevalence of osteoporosis, frailty and sarcopenia, androgen deprivation (ADT; 6 months) produces decreased muscle mass without impact on the incidence of the known adverse effects of androgen deprivation.

Effects of the lesion size on clinically significant prostate cancer detection rates in PI-RADS category 3-5 lesions.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) ranks second among prevalent cancers in men, necessitating effective screening tools such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) classification. This study explores the impact of lesion volume on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates in PI-RADS 3-5 lesions, aiming to contribute insights into the underexplored relationship between lesion size and csPCa detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 754 patients undergoing mpMRI-guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy between January 2016 and 2023. Patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions were included. Lesion size and PI-RADS categories were assessed through mpMRI, followed by MR fusion biopsy. RESULTS: Of the patients, 33.7%, 52.3%, and 14.1% had PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. Lesion sizes correlated significantly with csPCa detection in PI-RADS 4 and 5 categories. For PI-RADS 3 lesions, no significant differences in csPCa rates were observed based on lesion size. However, in PI-RADS 4 and 5 groups, larger lesions showed higher csPCa rates. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that subgroup categorizations based on lesion volume could predict clinically significant PCa with high accuracy, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and associated overtreatment. Future research should further explore the relationship between lesion size and csPCa, clarifying discussions regarding the inclusion of systematic biopsies in diagnostic protocols.

Role of psa levels and pathological stadiation before radiation therapy in predicting mp-MRI results in patients with prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PSA value in mp-MRI results prediction, analyzing patients with high (GS≥8, pT≥3, pN1) and low grade (GS<8, pT<3, pN0) Prostate Cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-eight patients underwent 1.5-Tmp-MRI after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) and before Radiotherapy (RT). They were divided into 2 groups: A and B, for patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and without BCR but with high local recurrence risk. Considering Gleason Score (GS), pT and pN as independent grouping variables, ROC analyses of PSA levels at primary PCa diagnosis and PSA before RT were performed in order to identify the optimal cut-off to predict mp-MRI result. RESULTS: Group A and B showed higher AUC for PSA before RT than PSA at PCa diagnosis, in low and high grade tumors. For low grade tumors the best AUC was 0.646 and 0.685 in group A and B; for high grade the best AUC was 0.705 and 1 in group A and B, respectively. For low grade tumors the best PSA cut-off was 0.565-0.58ng/mL in group A (sensitivity, specificity: 70.5%, 66%), and 0.11-0.13ng/mL in B (sensitivity, specificity: 62.5%, 84.6%). For high grade tumors, the best PSA cut-off obtained was 0.265-0.305ng/mL in group A (sensitivity, specificity: 95%, 42.1%), and 0.13-0.15ng/mL in B (sensitivity, specificity: 100%). CONCLUSION: Mp-MRI should be performed as added diagnostic tool always when a BCR is detected, especially in high grade PCa. In patients without BCR, mp-MRI results, although poorly related to pathological stadiation, still have a good diagnostic performance, mostly when PSA>0.1-0.15ng/mL.

What is the influence of lifestyle habits and socioeconomic factors on the occurrence of prostate cancer in Brazil? / ¿Cuál es la influencia de los hábitos de vida y de los factores socioeconómicos en la aparición del cáncer de próstata en Brasil? / Qual a influência de hábitos de vida e fatores socioeconômicos na ocorrência de câncer de próstata no Brasil?

Objective: the investigation of physical, lifestyle and socioeconomic features that may be associated with the occurrence of prostate cancer in Brazil. Methods: a microdata base referring to the 2019 National Health Survey in Brazil was used, with the selection of 42,799 male individuals; this group was analyzed using statistical methods and machine learning modeling (logistic regression and decision tree). Results: the models applied allowed us to identify with a good level of accuracy individuals with prostate cancer diagnosis (DCP), in addition to groups with specific features more strongly associated with such a disease. Conclusion: the models indicate a significant influence of socioeconomic, physical and dietary factors on the frequency of DCP in the analyzed group. The high level of accuracy and sensitivity of the models demonstrates the potential of machine learning methods for predicting DCP.

Objetivo: investigar características físicas, de estilo de vida y socioeconómicas que pueden estar asociadas con la aparición de cáncer de próstata en Brasil. Métodos: se utilizó una base de microdatos referente a la Encuesta Nacional de Salud de 2019, con la selección de 42.799 individuos del sexo masculino; este grupo fue analizado mediante métodos estadísticos y modelado de machine learning (regresión logística y árbol de decisión). Resultados: los modelos aplicados permitieron identificar con buen nivel de exactitud a los individuos con diagnóstico de cáncer de próstata (DCP), además de grupos con características específicas más fuertemente asociadas a esta enfermedad. Conclusión: los modelos indican influencia significativa de factores socioeconómicos, físicos y dietéticos sobre la frecuencia de DCP en el grupo analizado. El alto nivel de exactitud y sensibilidad de los modelos demuestra el potencial de los métodos de machine learning para predecir la DCP.

Objetivo: investigar características físicas, de hábitos de vida e socioeconômicas que podem estar associadas à ocorrência de câncer de próstata no Brasil. Métodos: uma base de microdados referente à Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2019 foi utilizada, com a seleção de 42.799 indivíduos do sexo masculino; este grupo foi analisado por meio de métodos estatísticos e modelagem por machine learning (regressão logística e árvore de decisão). Resultados: os modelos aplicados permitiram identificar com bom nível de acurácia os indivíduos que receberam o diagnóstico de câncer de próstata (DCP), além de grupos com características específicas mais fortemente associados a esta doença. Conclusão: os modelos indicam uma influência significativa de fatores socioeconômicos, físicos e alimentares na frequência de DCP no grupo analisado. O alto nível de acurácia e sensibilidade dos modelos demonstra o potencial dos métodos de machine learning para a previsão de DCP.

Cost analysis of next-generation imaging in high-risk prostate cancer staging.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Next-generation imaging (NGI) tests, such as choline PET/CT and PSMA PET, have shown to increase sensitivity in the detection of nodal and metastatic disease in prostate cancer. However, their use implies an increase in diagnostic costs compared to conventional imaging (CI) tests such as CT and bone scan. The aim of our study was to determine which diagnostic pathway is more cost-effective in high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Cost-effectiveness analysis of the available imaging tests (CI, Choline/PSMA PET) for the staging of high-risk prostate cancer. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated based on published evidence, and costs were collected from the Management Department. In order to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis, five diagnostic pathways were proposed estimating the accurate diagnoses. RESULTS: PSMA PET was the most accurate diagnostic option. The CI diagnostic workup was the most economical and CI+PSMA the most expensive. Analyzing the diagnostic cost-effectiveness ratio, CI+PSMA proved to be the most expensive (€5627.30 per correct diagnosis) followed by PET PSMA (€4987.11), choline (€4599.84) and CI (€4444.22). CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET is the most accurate strategy in staging distant disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Radiotracer uptake tests such as CI have been shown to be the most cost-effective option, followed by choline and PSMA.

Clinical evaluation and treatment in men with low testosterone levels and prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: A high prevalence of low testosterone levels has been reported in men with prostate cancer. The use of testosterone therapy in men with a history of prostate cancer is still controversial, and there is uncertainty regarding the management of these patients. METHODS: We analyzed the European and American guidelines on this topic and presented the clinical experience in the management of patients with low testosterone levels and a history of prostate cancer in one of the world's leading cancer centers. RESULTS: According to the published evidence to date, testosterone therapy in men with prostate cancer does not increase the risk of prostate cancer recurrence in the short and medium term, but there is a lack of data on the long term. Symptomatic men with low testosterone levels who are candidates for this therapy need a thorough clinical evaluation before commencing testosterone therapy. Evaluation of prostate cancer history including type of treatment administered, pathologic stage of prostate cancer and prostate specific antigen should be requested before and during testosterone treatment to assess its trend. CONCLUSION: Prostate-specific antigen should remain undetectable after radical prostatectomy or stable after radiotherapy. Otherwise, it would be a sign of uncontrolled prostate cancer, and the patient may require cessation of testosterone therapy and referral to oncology for further evaluation.

Autoeficacia para el tamizaje de cáncer cervical o de próstata: comparando mujeres y hombres colombianos

Introducción: Los cánceres de cuello uterino y próstata tienen una importante carga de morbilidad en países en desarrollo. La autoeficacia para solicitar el tamizaje es un elemento clave en la prevención. Objetivo: Comparar la percepción de hombres y mujeres sobre autoeficacia para el tamizaje de cáncer cervical y de próstata. Métodos: Estudio mixto con 50 mujeres y 50 hombres. Se indagaron datos sociodemográficos. Se aplicó la escala de autoeficacia de detección del cáncer cervical, con una modificación de esta para medición de cáncer de próstata en hombres. La autoeficacia se clasificó por niveles y las variables asociadas a esta se identificaron con regresión robusta. Se realizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas a 27 individuos (18 hombres y 9 mujeres) con baja y alta autoeficacia, así como a individuos de "otra" religión, para conocer las diferencias en la intención del tamizaje. Se crearon tres categorías de análisis basadas en el modelo de creencias en salud. Resultados: Mujeres y hombres fueron similares, excepto en religión, ocupación y antecedentes de Papanicolaou o examen rectal. La autoeficacia fue mayor entre las mujeres (ß aj.:-15,29 IC del 95 %: -18,36 a -12,21) y los no creyentes (ß aj.: -5,38 IC del 95 %: -10,33 a -0,44). Ellas buscan más el tamizaje que los hombres, quienes necesitan tener síntomas para hacerlo, necesitan tener síntomas. La vergüenza e incomodidad son barreras expresadas por ambos sexos. En los hombres, el machismo es una fuerte barrera para solicitar el tamizaje. La religión asocia el sexo con impureza, siendo una barrera entre las mujeres. Los servicios de atención de la salud solo se centran en el cribado femenino. Conclusiones: Los roles de género y elementos de religión son expresiones culturales que determinan la intención de detección del cáncer en hombres y mujeres. Las intervenciones de los servicios de salud deben considerar estos elementos para mejorar la cobertura de detección temprana y reducir la morbimortalidad de estos dos tipos de cáncer.

Introduction: Cervical and prostate cancers have a significant burden of disease in developing countries. Self-efficacy to request screening is a key element in prevention. Objective: To compare the perception of men and women on self-efficacy for cervical and prostate cancer screening. Methods: Mixed study with 50 women and 50 men. Sociodemographic data was investigated. The cervical cancer detection self-efficacy scale was applied, with a modification for measuring prostate cancer in men. Self-efficacy was classified by levels and the variables associated with it were identified with robust regression. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 individuals (18 men and 9 women) with low and high self-efficacy and of "other religion" to know the differences in the intention of the screening. Three categories of analysis were created based on the health belief model. Results: Women and men were similar except for religion, occupation, and history of Pap smear or rectal exam. Self-efficacy was higher among women (Adj. ß: -15.29, 95% CI: -18.36 to -12.21) and non-believers (Adj. ß: -5.38, 95% CI: -10.33 to -0.44). They seek screening more than men because they need to have symptoms. Shame and discomfort are barriers expressed by both genders. In men, machismo is a strong barrier to request screening. Religion associates sex with impurity, thus, acts as a barrier among women. Health care services only focus on female screening. Conclusions: gender roles and elements of religion are cultural expressions, which determine the intention of cancer detection in men and women. Health services interventions should consider these elements to improve the coverage of early detection and reduce the morbidity and mortality of these two types of cancer.

Utilidad del índice nutricional pronóstico como criterio de selección para la vigilancia activa en el cáncer de próstata / Could Prognostic Nutritional Index be a new criteria for active surveillance of prostate cancer?

Objetivo Determinar el valor del índice nutricional pronóstico (INP) en la selección de pacientes para vigilancia activa (VA) en cáncer de próstata. Métodos Entre septiembre de 2020 y junio de 2022, se analizaron retrospectivamente los datos de 125 pacientes que se sometieron a prostatectomía laparoscópica asistida por robot. Todos los pacientes eran candidatos aptos para VA antes de la operación. Con base en los resultados patológicos obtenidos en la prostatectomía laparoscópica asistida por robot, los pacientes fueron asignados a 2 grupos. Los pacientes que cumplían con los criterios para VA se asignaron al grupo 1 y los demás se asignaron al grupo 2. Se compararon datos demográficos, valores de INP y parámetros hematológicos de los grupos. Resultados El 38% (n:48) de los pacientes cumplió los criterios del grupo 1 y el 62% (n:77) cumplió los criterios del grupo 2. Se encontró un incremento de grado y estadio (upgrade y upstage) en 76 (61%) y 26 (21%) pacientes, respectivamente. No hay diferencias significativas entre los grupos en cuanto a edad, IMC, PSA, densidad de PSA, volumen prostático y PI-RADS. El primer grupo obtuvo un valor de INP más alto. El valor de 49,45 se calculó mediante análisis ROC como el valor de corte ideal de INP para predecir la reclasificación a un grado y estadio más alto del cáncer de próstata (p<0,001). De acuerdo con el análisis de regresión tanto univariante como multivariante, se encontró que el INP era un predictor de exclusión de la VA (p<0,001). Conclusión Los incrementos de grado y estadio se detectan con mayor frecuencia en pacientes con valores bajos de INP. El uso del valor INP en la selección de pacientes para VA aumentará la tasa de éxito en la selección de los candidatos óptimos. (AU)

Objective To evaluate the importance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index(PNI) value for patient selection of active surveillance (AS) in prostate cancer. Methods Between September 2020 and June 2022, the data of 125-patients who underwent Robot-Assisted-Laparoscopic-Prostatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were suitable for AS preoperatively. Using the pathological results of Robot-Assisted-Laparoscopic-Prostatectomy, patients have been divided 2 groups. Patients who met the criteria for AS were defined as the first group, others were defined second. Demographic datas, PNI values and hematological parameters of the groups were compared. Results 38%(n:48) patients were found suitable for the group 1, and 62%(n:77) were found suitable for the group 2. Upgrading and upstaging were found at 76 patients (61%) and 26 (21%), respectively. There is no significant difference between groups on age, BMI, PSA, PSA-density, prostate volume, and PIRADS. PNI value was found higher at first group. The value of 49.45 was calculated by ROC analysis as the ideal PNI cut-off value for predicting upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer(P<.001).According to the both univariate and multivariate regression analysis, PNI was found a predictor for exclusion from AS (P<.001). Conclusion Upgrading and upstaging are detected at a higher rate in patients with low PNI values. The use of PNI value in the selection of patients to AS will increase the success rate of ideal patient selection. (AU)

Comparison between the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators: Prediction of clinically significant Prostate Cancer risk in a cohort of patients from Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the risk calculators of the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) in predicting the risk of presenting clinically significant prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospectively, patients who underwent prostate biopsy at Sanatorio Allende Cerro, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina, were identified from January 2018 to December 2021. The probability of having prostate cancer was calculated with the two calculators separately and then the results were compared to establish which of the two performed better. For this, areas under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. RESULTS: 250 patients were included, 140 (56%) presented prostate cancer, of which 92 (65.71%) had clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥7). The patients who presented cancer were older, had a higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, and had a smaller prostate size. The AUC to predict the probability of having clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.79 and 0.73 for PBCG-RC and ERSPC-RC respectively (P=0.0084). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients, both prostate cancer risk calculators performed well in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer risk, although the PBCG-RC showed better accuracy.

Resonancia magnética en la detección, estadificación y seguimiento del cáncer de próstata: síntesis de las guías PI-RADS v2.1, MET-RADS, PRECISE y PI-RR / MRI for detection, staging, and follow-up of prostate cancer: Synthesis of the PI-RADS v2.1, MET-RADS, PRECISE, and PI-RR guidelines

El cáncer de próstata es muy frecuente entre los hombres. La radiología, a través fundamentalmente de la RM, tiene un papel clave en las distintas etapas del cáncer de próstata: diagnóstico, estadificación y valoración del tratamiento. El correcto manejo de la RM requiere conocer y utilizar de forma eficaz las distintas guías elaboradas para la adquisición, interpretación e informe de la RM en el diagnóstico (guía PI-RADS), estadificación de cuerpo entero (guía MET-RADS), vigilancia activa (guía PRECISE) y recidiva local (guía PI-RR) en el cáncer de próstata. El objetivo de este artículo es mostrar una actualización y síntesis de los aspectos más relevantes de estas guías en RM para una óptima utilización y proporcionar así un manejo más eficaz del cáncer de próstata.(AU)

Prostate cancer is very common among men. Radiology, mainly through MRI, plays a key role in the different stages of prostate cancer: diagnosis, staging and treatment assessment. The correct management of MRI requires knowledge and proper use of the different guidelines developed for the acquisition, interpretation and reporting of MRI in diagnosis (PI-RADS guide), whole body staging (MET-RADS guide), active surveillance (PRECISE guide) and local recurrence (PI-RR guide) in prostate cancer. The objective of this article is to show an update and synthesis of the most relevant aspects of these MRI guidelines for an optimal use and thus providing a more effective management of prostate cancer.(AU)

Biomarcadores pronósticos en el uso del radio-223 en pacientes con cáncer de próstata metastásico resistente a la castración / Prognostic biomarkers in the use of radium-223 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Objetivos Establecer biomarcadores basales en pacientes con cáncer de próstata metastásico resistente a la castración (CPMRC) tratados con Ra-223 que predigan una mejor supervivencia global (SG), así como valorar la toxicidad hematológica y la respuesta. Materiales y métodos Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico en 151 pacientes con CPMRC tratados con Ra-223 entre 2013 y 2020. Se valoró la SG de acuerdo a: los niveles basales de hemoglobina (Hb), el antígeno prostático específico (PSA), la fosfatasa alcalina (FA), la escala de dolor de la OMS, el Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), el número de lesiones en gammagrafía ósea (GO), el uso de agentes de protección ósea y las dosis recibidas. Se determinó el grado de toxicidad hematológica y la respuesta basada en los cambios de la FA y el dolor pre y postratamiento. Resultados Mediana de SG de 24meses (IC95%: 16,5-31). En el 70% que recibieron tratamiento completo (5-6dosis) la mediana de SG fue de 34,9meses, versus 5,8 en el tratamiento incompleto (1-4dosis). La SG fue mayor en los pacientes con menor PSA, FA, Hb>13g/dl, menor número de metástasis óseas y ECOG 0-1. 52/151pacientes (34%) fallecieron durante el seguimiento. Cerca del 70% de los pacientes presentaron disminución del dolor, y el 66%, reducción de la FA. La mitad de los pacientes presentaron eventos adversos hematológicos leves, y solo el 5%, severos. Conclusiones Los pacientes con CPMRC tratados con Ra-223 que presentan biomarcadores basales como Hb>13g/ml, ECOG 0-1, PSA<20ng/ml y menor número de lesiones en GO muestran mejor SG, con un adecuado perfil de seguridad (AU)

Objectives Establish basal biomarkers in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with Ra-223 that predicted a better overall survival (OS), assess hematology toxicity and treatment response. Materials and methods Retrospective multicenter study in 151 patients with mCRPC between 2013 and 2020. OS was assessed according to basal hemoglobin (Hb), PSA, alkaline phosphatase (AP), WHO pain scale, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), number of metastatic lesions on bone scan (BS), use of protective bone agents and received. Hematological toxicities were evaluated. Treatment response was based on changes in FA and pain. Results Median OS was 24months (95%CI: 16.5-31). OS in 70% of patients who received complete Ra-223 treatment (5-6 doses) was 34.9m vs. 5.8m in patients with incomplete treatment (1-4 doses). OS was longer in patients with lower PSA and AP, Hb>13g/dL, lesser bone metastasis on GO and ECOG 0-1. 52/151 patients (34%) died during follow-up. Nearly 70% of patients experienced decrease in pain and 66% reduction on AP. Half of patients had mild hematological adverse effects and only 5% had severe. Conclusions mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 who had Hb>13g/mL, ECOG 0-1, low AP, PSA<20ng/ml and lesser bone metastasis on BS shown a better OS with adequate safety profile (AU)

Intervenciones hacia la Prueba de Antígeno Prostático: Una revisión rápida de literatura / Interventions for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing: A Rapid Literature Review

Objetivo: Identificar la mejor evidencia disponible relacionada a las intervenciones dirigidas hacia la aceptación de la prueba de antígeno prostático. Metodología: Revisión rápida de literatura, siguiendo los pasos establecidos por Tapia-Benavente, los cuales son: 1.- pregunta de investigación, para lo cual se utilizó la estructura PICO acotada a la definición del problema, intervención y resultado; 2.- búsqueda de bibliografía en bases de datos reconocidas; 3.- selección de estudios y extracción de datos; 4.- evaluación del riesgo de sesgo, para lo cual se utilizó la guía de comprobación de ensayos clínicos del grupo CONSORT; y 5.- la elaboración de la síntesis además de la conclusión de la evidencia encontrada. Resultados: La búsqueda rápida de literatura arrojó un total de 51 publicaciones de tres bases de datos, PubMed (27), EBSCO (13) y SCOPUS (11); de los cuales 11 cumplían con los criterios de inclusión. El 100% de los estudios indican un cambio significativo entre el grupo experimental y control (p < .05). Las estrategias más utilizadas incluyen la visita domiciliaria, conferencias, debates en grupo, lluvia de ideas, dinámicas de pregunta y respuesta con diapositivas, así como presentación de folletos educativos, mismos que se ejecutan en un periodo de un día, hasta seis meses. Conclusiones: Se hace evidente el vacío de conocimiento referente al desarrollo e implementación de estrategias para abordar la conducta de prevención relacionada al Cancer de Próstata hacia varones de pueblos originarios, así como la falta de modelos de intervención de enfermería enfocadas en este padecimiento. (AU)

Objective: To identify the best available evidence related to interventions for the acceptance of the prostate-specific antigen test. Methodology: Rapid literature review following the steps established by Tapia-Benavente, which are: 1.- research question, for which the PICO structure limited to the definition of the problem, intervention, and result was used; 2.- bibliography search in recognized databases; 3.- study selection and data extraction; 4.- bias risk assessment, for which the CONSORT group clinical trial verification guidelines were used; and 5.- preparation of a summary and conclusion of the evidence found. Results: The rapid literature search yielded a total of 51 publications from three databases, PubMed (27), EBSCO (13), and SCOPUS (11); 11 of which met the inclusion criteria. One hundred percent of the studies indicated a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (p < .05). The most frequently used strategies included home visits, conferences, group discussions, brainstorming, question-and-answer dynamics with slides, as well as the use of educational brochures, and were carried out in a period of one day and up to six months. Conclusions: There is an evident knowledge gap in the development and implementation of strategies for Prostate Cancer prevention behavior directed to indigenous men, as well as a lack of nursing intervention models focused on this disease. (AU)

Factores pronósticos de metástasis ósea en pacientes con cáncer de próstata / Predictive factors for bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer i: en

El adenocarcinoma de próstata es considerado una de las neoplasias más frecuentes en hombres mayores de 60 años, y su metástasis ósea constituye una de las complicaciones de peor pronóstico. Objetivo: Estimar los factores pronósticos de metástasis ósea en pacientes con cáncer de próstata. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio analítico de 73 pacientes con cáncer de próstata, asistidos en el Hospital Oncológico Conrado Benítez de Santiago de Cuba en el período 2018-2022. Entre las variables analizadas figuraron: edad, color de la piel, manifestaciones clínicas, tiempo de aparición de la metástasis ósea, grado de diferenciación celular, nivel de antígeno prostático específico y diagnóstico imagenológico. Resultados: En la serie predominó el grupo etario de 60-69 años (50,7 %) y el promedio de edad fue de 67 años; asimismo, prevalecieron los pacientes de piel negra, el dolor óseo como síntoma más frecuente y el diagnóstico imagenológico de metástasis ósea por tomografía axial computarizada (48,0 %). Se observó un aumento proporcional de los valores del antígeno prostático específico y de la puntuación de Gleason en relación con la aparición de metástasis. Conclusiones: Los factores pronósticos que permiten estimar la presencia de metástasis ósea en pacientes con cáncer de próstata son la edad avanzada, el color negro de la piel y los valores de antígeno prostático específico por encima de 20 ng/mL.

Prostate adenocarcinoma is considered one of the most frequent neoplasms in men over 60 years, and bone metastasis constitutes one of the complications with the worst prognosis. Objective: Estimate the predictive factors for bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: An analytic study of 73 patients with prostate cancer was carried out. They were assisted at Conrado Benítez Cancer Hospital in Santiago de Cuba during 2018-2022. The variables analyzed included: age, skin color, clinical manifestations, onset time of bone metastasis, degree of cellular differentiation, prostate-specific antigen level and imaging diagnosis. Results: In the series there was a prevalence of the 60-69 age group (50.7%) and the average age was 67 years; also, dark skinned patients, bone pain as more frequent symptom and imaging diagnosis of bone metastasis by computerized axial tomography prevailed (48.0%). A proportional increase of prostate-specific antigen values and Gleason punctuation was observed in relation to the metastasis onset. Conclusions: The predictive factors for estimating the presence of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer are the advanced age, black skin color and prostate-specific antigen values above 20 ng/mL.